[LinuxUsers] MySQL vs. postgreSQL

[Trevor Benedict]

Pretty sure Drizzle is NOT ment for that kind of use. Its more for smaller
sites
What would be cool is if the common web languages can use the same mysql
protocol with drizzle. I really hope that happens.
-- Trevor


On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Dino K <socallinux at cloudcomp.info> wrote:

> keeping it simple is always a good policy except for the fact some sites I
> work on are massive... as in massive amounts of transactions per second
> which needs load balanced front ends, sometimes in the hundreds to thousands
> of servers per "cluster", sharding allows us to relieve a lot of database
> contention...
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Trevor Benedict <mrecho at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Drizzle is a very good project. They took all the old, useless stuff out,
>> and made it much better.
>> Just how replication is going to work is going to be nice.
>> I dont use alot of MySQL's functionality, I try to keep things simple.
>> Simple = less issues.
>>  -- Trevor
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Dino K <socallinux at cloudcomp.info>wrote:
>>
>>> Not to detract from the question but built in sharding on Drizzle will be
>>> awesome.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LinuxUsers mailing list
>>> LinuxUsers at socallinux.org
>>> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LinuxUsers mailing list
>> LinuxUsers at socallinux.org
>> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxUsers mailing list
> LinuxUsers at socallinux.org
> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://socallinux.org/pipermail/linuxusers/attachments/20100213/bf235cee/attachment.htm>