[LinuxUsers] Good Web Hosting

[Trevor Benedict]

The issue that I have with VPS's is that if you update something, like a
major php/apache change they love to break. Ive had cpanel and plesk go
fubar on me. Then again, these newer hosting co. do have beater control
panels.
I really don't want to be this guys sys admin on his sites. Guess I just
have to do more research.
-- Trevor

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Michael Gorman <craterburnsyou at gmail.com>wrote:

> I've been using rackspace cloud, rackspace's VPS solution for some time for
> a few different domains. I've had no real problems and from what I've seen
> the price/quality can't be beat elsewhere.
>
> They do not update the systems for you however. No VPS i've used has ever
> offered that. A VPS is really more like having a dedicated server. You have
> root access and handle everything yourself, and it is cheaper because you
> are virtualized and they don't have to invest in hardware for every
> customer, and can scale very easily.
>
> Michael Gorman
> http://michaeljgorman.com
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Roger E. Rustad, Jr <
> roger.rustad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Trevor Benedict wrote:
>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>
>> Ask each provider if they've ever hired a certain "security consultant"
>> from San Diego, and if they say yes, RUN THE OTHER WAY!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LinuxUsers mailing list
>> LinuxUsers at socallinux.org
>> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxUsers mailing list
> LinuxUsers at socallinux.org
> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://socallinux.org/pipermail/linuxusers/attachments/20091123/5f33ba03/attachment.htm>