[LinuxUsers] Code Reuse in Google Chrome

[Peter Manis]

It just started to pour here, sunny and bright in socal? :p

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Chris Louden <chris at chrislouden.com> wrote:

> ok you win. i give.
>
> you have removed so many line breaks/spaces from the message that its
> just one big lump of text and i don't have the patience to try
> separate which lines are mine, yours or someone else's so that i can
> put together a reply.
>
> Next topic?
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Paul Saenz <downtoearthman at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Chris Louden wrote:> > It is very easy for the written word to be
> misconstrued. However when> you make statements like "they have too much
> control over internet> traffic" I don't think there is much to misconstrue.
> Thats a really> bold statement/opinion and I disagree with it.It would be a
> bold statement, if I had said Google has too much control overinternet
> traffic. That is why I wrote "I think they have too much control over
> internet traffic." When I say "I think," that means that it is my opinion.
> If it is my opinion, then is is subjective. It is subject to my opinion, and
> it is subject to the opinions of other's. It is not an absolute statement.
> When I say, "I think," it also suggests that my opinion is subject to
> change. The fact that my opinion of Google had been influenced, and improved
> by their efforts to release Chrome in open source, was the whole point of my
> little statement in the beginning. Therefore, if you leave outkey words "I
> think," that convey the sense of what I am saying, then you are
> miscontrueing my statement.  > > are you saying Firefox doesn't have enough
> plugins?I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying that someone, not necessarily
> firefox, may be interestedin puttings some plugins into Chrome. (I don't
> even know if that is possible)I have heard in this thread people say that
> some people like firefox's plug-ins. But that is just an example.My real
> point is that it must change. The code will invariably evolve. Regardless of
> what the change is, it will change.> .> > Thats not change, if Mozilla moved
> over to Google/webkit that would be> assimilation. An assimilagtion is a
> change. One type of change is like what Google Chromeattempts to do. They
> are attempting to change, in large part, the philosophy of web
> browsing.Another type of change is when you change, and/or improve code, a
> little here and a little there,and yet another type of change is
> assimilation. If you make a statement and you want to specify which type of
> change you are referring to, then you must define it. On the other hand,if
> don't define what type of change you are referring to, then the default
> meaning of changeincludes all types of change. When I used the word change,
> I was referring to any type of change.
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows
> Live.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093185mrt/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > LinuxUsers mailing list
> > LinuxUsers at socallinux.org
> > http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxUsers mailing list
> LinuxUsers at socallinux.org
> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>



-- 
Peter Manis
(540) 999-4088
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://socallinux.org/pipermail/linuxusers/attachments/20080908/8180c77e/attachment.htm>